Seller agrees D/A 60 days to win the buyer’s order.
Case: D/A Documentary Collection
An exporter gives the buyer 60 days after acceptance and discovers why collection is not a bank guarantee.
Seller ships goods and gives documents plus collection instruction to its remitting bank.
Collecting bank presents documents and a time draft to buyer.
Buyer accepts the draft; documents are released according to the instruction.
Buyer takes goods before paying the seller.
60 days later buyer has cash-flow problems and does not pay.
Collecting bank follows instructions but is not automatically liable for buyer’s default.
Seller pursues the accepted obligation/legal remedies; future deals may use LC, guarantee, insurance or tighter credit terms.
What this case teaches
- D/A gives buyer credit.
- Bank handling does not automatically shift payment risk.
- Accepted corporate draft is different from a bank acceptance.
Work the case like a practitioner
Before looking only at the outcome, separate the instrument from the surrounding transaction. Use these questions every time.
What undertaking, payment method or document is actually involved?
What rules, expiry, maturity or presentation deadline controls the next step?
Which facts are independently verified and which are only counterparty claims?
What must the bank authenticate, approve, examine or settle?
Remember: a case illustrates a method of thinking. A real bank may require different documents, approvals or procedures.
Check 1
What would most directly change the credit risk if a bank accepted the time draft?
