Compare · Fast reference
ISP98 vs URDG 758
See the structural difference first, then open the full lessons for exceptions and detailed procedure.
| Question | ISP98 | URDG 758 |
|---|---|---|
| Designed primarily for | Standby letters of credit | Demand guarantees / counter-guarantees |
| Documentary independence | Yes | Yes |
| Typical terminology | Standby, beneficiary, issuer, presentation | Guarantee, guarantor, counter-guarantee, demand |
| Can market practice overlap? | Yes — instruments can look commercially similar | Yes — choice of form/rules depends on transaction and legal/bank practice |
Remember thisA comparison simplifies the big picture. The actual undertaking, rules, wording, law and bank policy still control the real transaction.
How to use this comparison
The labels are a starting point, not a substitute for the actual wording. Before choosing a structure, ask what creates the payment obligation, who carries the credit risk, what rules apply, what event triggers payment and whether the receiving bank or financier accepts the structure.
1. Obligation
Who actually promises or is ordered to pay?
Who actually promises or is ordered to pay?
2. Trigger
What must happen before payment is due?
What must happen before payment is due?
3. Rules & documents
What wording or documentary conditions control the result?
What wording or documentary conditions control the result?
4. Bank acceptance
Will the relevant bank accept, advise, confirm, finance or process it?
Will the relevant bank accept, advise, confirm, finance or process it?