Underlying obligation
Applicant and beneficiary agree the contract or obligation that the standby is intended to support.
A typical standby lifecycle, including the common bank-policy and negotiated variations people encounter in provider and bank-to-bank procedures.
Applicant and beneficiary agree the contract or obligation that the standby is intended to support.
The applicant asks its bank to issue the standby and provides proposed wording, beneficiary details, amount, expiry and applicable rules.
The bank assesses customer exposure, cash/facility support, legal terms, KYC, sanctions, country and transaction risk.
Some transactions use pre-advice, readiness messages or other bank-to-bank communication before issuance. This is not a universal SBLC requirement.
Some third-party/provider procedures ask the receiving side for a bank payment undertaking or payment assurance before the provider bank issues MT760. Whether a bank will do this depends on its product, credit and legal approval; it is not an ISP98 requirement for every standby.
After approval, MT760 is the structured SWIFT message used to issue a demand guarantee or standby letter of credit.
The advising bank receives the bank message, checks its apparent authenticity and advises the standby to the beneficiary.
Normally the standby simply remains available until expiry while the applicant performs the underlying obligation.
Changes may require agreement and bank processing. MT767 is the SWIFT MT message used for amendments to guarantees/standbys.
If a drawing event occurs, the beneficiary presents the demand and any required documents. The bank examines the presentation; otherwise the standby eventually expires or terminates according to its terms.
Some bank-to-bank or third-party provider procedures add preliminary messages before MT760. MyGreed treats these as a separate negotiated layer, not as an automatic “standard SBLC procedure.”