Employer requires a 10% performance guarantee from an acceptable local bank.
Case: Construction Performance Guarantee
A contractor must provide a local guarantee to an overseas employer.
Contractor asks its home bank for support; bank approves a counter-guarantee facility.
Home bank issues counter-guarantee to the beneficiary-country bank, potentially via MT760.
Local bank issues the demand guarantee directly to the employer.
Both undertakings remain outstanding; expiry periods are coordinated.
If employer makes a compliant demand under the local guarantee, local guarantor examines it.
Local bank may make a separate demand under the counter-guarantee according to its terms.
Each bank pays under its own independent undertaking if the relevant presentation complies.
What this case teaches
- Local guarantee and counter-guarantee are separate undertakings.
- URDG 758 can govern each if incorporated.
- Expiry mismatch can create risk for the banks/contractor.
Work the case like a practitioner
Before looking only at the outcome, separate the instrument from the surrounding transaction. Use these questions every time.
What undertaking, payment method or document is actually involved?
What rules, expiry, maturity or presentation deadline controls the next step?
Which facts are independently verified and which are only counterparty claims?
What must the bank authenticate, approve, examine or settle?
Remember: a case illustrates a method of thinking. A real bank may require different documents, approvals or procedures.
Check 1
Can the home bank simply assume the local guarantee and counter-guarantee have identical conditions?
